Showing posts with label Aerts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aerts. Show all posts

Wednesday, 19 April 2017

"Circle of Vrancx" is another copy after Hendrick Aerts

Merry Old England, a quantly named auction house from Germany, sells on 20 April 2017 a "Circle of Sebastiaen Vrancx and Hendrick van Steenwijk the Younger, monogrammed CVL f(ecit)" chruch interior, estimated at 16,000 Euro.

It is another (nice) copy after Hendrick Aerts, a view of the chruch of Laterans which I already discussed in September 2016.

I have no idea why the auction house references Sebastiaan Vrancx, I see no link with his work. Strangely, the work for sale was offered at Sotheby's Amsterdam in 2002 with the correct identification of subject and origin,as can easily be found at RKD. This makes it clear that the scene on the left, which replaces the baptismal font in the original, is "Jesus and the Adulterous Woman". It dates the work to 1658. I haven't been able to find the result in 2002 though.

The estimate seems somewhat high for what is in the end one of many copies of this work (though far from the worst of them). 6,000 to 8,000 Euro seems more realistic.

Friday, 16 September 2016

"Attributed to Hendrick Aerts" is copy after engraving


Hampel, from Germany, sells on 22 September 2016 an Attributed to Hendrick Aerts, ca. 1575" view of a Gothic Church with people, estimated at 15,000 to 20,000 Euro.

It is a depiction of the interion of the Saint John of Laterans, in Rome. For some reason this work has often been copied, but no oiriginal by Aerts seems to be known. So the question is whether this is the original, or another copy. While it at first glance is a very good version, it falls a bit flat when seen upclose. Further research shows that this is due to the fact that it is closest to the engraving of the original made by Jan van Londerseel around 1600, apart from the praying pope in the front which has simply disappeared in the painting.


Other copies of the painting are usually less close to the engraving, as the above examples show (top one from was for sale at Jean Moust, bottom one painted by Pieter Neeffs the elder).

Looking at details, the engraving is always more precise, a lot clearer about what is being shown, while the painting often only suggests what is there. So the sad conclusion is that this as well isn't the original by Aerts, and most likely not by him at all.

One original by Aerts was sold at Bonham's in 2000 for about the current estimate: but works like this, copies of this work by anonymous  followers of Aerts, have sold for about 5,000 Euro the past few years, and I would estimate this one at the same.