Horta, from Belgium, sells on 11 September 2018 a "Flemish School, 16th or 17th century" Descent from the cross estimated at 4,000 to 6,000 Euro.
It is another (but much better) copy after the work by Hugo Van der Goes, which I already discussed in April 2018. The above version is from Cambrai, and I doubt it is the original (or else it has had a lot of poor restorations and overpaint). But it gives a good idea of how the original probably looked.
The work for sale has some very good parts, especially the two figures on the left. The Mary and John are clearly weaker (e.g. the hands of the virgin are very poorly executed). The painting looks to be from around 1550, certainly the Jesus looks to modern to be 15th century. But even so, it is one of the better and more interesting copies, and should be worth the estimate without much trouble.
Thursday, 30 August 2018
Tuesday, 28 August 2018
18K€ "attributed to Otto van Veen" is copy after engraving by Aegidius Sadeler after Hans Speckaert
Monsantic, from Belgium, sells on 2 September 2018 an "attributed to Otto van Veen" Adoration of the Magi, estimated at 18,000 to 22,000 Euro.
Which would be a considerable amount for a fair Otto Van Veen, but is way too much for a work in rather poor condition. It seems to have lost most of its freshness, as if it has been kept unvarnished for too long. Even so, it looks as if it was made by a competent but not brilliant painter, and the auctioneer (or seller) may have been deceived by the good composition into attributing it to a better painter.
The work is based on en engraving by Aegidius Sadeler (copy from the Rijksmuseum), which copied a painting by Hans Speckaert (1540-1577).
I had never heard of him, but he is one of the Flemish painters who stayed mainly in Italy in the 16th century, and had through their works and the engravings made of them a considerable influence on art in the Netherlands, moving away from the late Gothic (Early Netherlandish) style towards more Italian-style Renaissance images, especially the so-caled Northern Mannerism style with highly exaggerated figures (something which in a different form had already been popular in the circle of Coecke van Aelst some decades earlier). Bartholomeus Spranger is probably the best known of these painters.
The RKD lists one other version of this painting, a very small oval one which they date to the late 16th century (without indication of its origin as an engraving). Both these paintings are considerably worse in the details compared to the engraving, so they are not the original by Speckaert, in case anyone wondered.
Anyway, all this doesn't prove that it isn't by van Veen, but a copy after an engraving, by a decent painter but in a rather poor condition (and at 75cm wide not particularly large either), is not worth 18,000€ by a wide margin. Some 3,000 Euro perhaps, depending on whether people really like the style this has been painted in and believe that some care could bring the colours back to life a bit, which I doubt.
Which would be a considerable amount for a fair Otto Van Veen, but is way too much for a work in rather poor condition. It seems to have lost most of its freshness, as if it has been kept unvarnished for too long. Even so, it looks as if it was made by a competent but not brilliant painter, and the auctioneer (or seller) may have been deceived by the good composition into attributing it to a better painter.
The work is based on en engraving by Aegidius Sadeler (copy from the Rijksmuseum), which copied a painting by Hans Speckaert (1540-1577).
Jaël and Sisera, a typical Speckaert painting (Boijmans - Van Beuningen)
I had never heard of him, but he is one of the Flemish painters who stayed mainly in Italy in the 16th century, and had through their works and the engravings made of them a considerable influence on art in the Netherlands, moving away from the late Gothic (Early Netherlandish) style towards more Italian-style Renaissance images, especially the so-caled Northern Mannerism style with highly exaggerated figures (something which in a different form had already been popular in the circle of Coecke van Aelst some decades earlier). Bartholomeus Spranger is probably the best known of these painters.
The RKD lists one other version of this painting, a very small oval one which they date to the late 16th century (without indication of its origin as an engraving). Both these paintings are considerably worse in the details compared to the engraving, so they are not the original by Speckaert, in case anyone wondered.
Anyway, all this doesn't prove that it isn't by van Veen, but a copy after an engraving, by a decent painter but in a rather poor condition (and at 75cm wide not particularly large either), is not worth 18,000€ by a wide margin. Some 3,000 Euro perhaps, depending on whether people really like the style this has been painted in and believe that some care could bring the colours back to life a bit, which I doubt.
Monday, 20 August 2018
"Follower of Breughel" is a copy after Hans Bol
Auktionshaus Saarbrücken, from Germany, sells on 1 September 2018 an "Unknown artist, follower of Breughel, probably 17th century" depiction of the Parable of the Tares (the auction house thinks it is the Parable of the Sower, but that's a different story), estimated at 900 Euro.
It is a copy after an engraving by Hans Bol from 1574, as can be found in the collection of the Rijksmuseum. The church on the left, the castle on the right with the central round tower, the figure of the sowing devil, the sleeping man on the right, ... are all taken from the engraving. Only the horses have been removed, and the trees made a bit fuller (which would look bad in an engraving). I don't think the painting is good enough to be by Bol, even though he wasn't always the most accomplished painter either, but it still is an interesting old work and the estimate is about right.
It is a copy after an engraving by Hans Bol from 1574, as can be found in the collection of the Rijksmuseum. The church on the left, the castle on the right with the central round tower, the figure of the sowing devil, the sleeping man on the right, ... are all taken from the engraving. Only the horses have been removed, and the trees made a bit fuller (which would look bad in an engraving). I don't think the painting is good enough to be by Bol, even though he wasn't always the most accomplished painter either, but it still is an interesting old work and the estimate is about right.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)